Abdullah
Bin Zarshaid
Contact

Evidence portfolio

Work you can inspect.
Limits you can see.

Six public artifacts connect code, teaching, governance and research. Every card separates an inspectable fact from the conclusion it cannot support.

PUBLIC ARTIFACTS6

Source links are provided for every item.

CLAIM MODELFact → limit

No employer, customer or private-company evidence is included.

SOURCE REVIEW17 October 2026

Repository state may change after this review date.

EVIDENCE CATALOGUE

Choose a working surface.

6 public artifacts shown

01 / Windows / Active Directory / wireless posturePublic repository

PostureKit

An evidence-led posture assessment toolkit with read-only collection, hashed evidence batches and transparent analysis rules.

  • 45 documented evidence sources and 45 analysis rules
  • 225 synthetic Python tests and 97 PowerShell fixture checks
  • Validation documented across a six-machine virtual lab
What this does not establish

It identifies and evidences selected configuration or patch weaknesses. It does not exploit systems, discover hosts or independently prove exploitability or complete coverage.

02 / Assessment evidence qualityPublic repository

EvidenceGate

An offline SQLite-backed checker for evidence-package integrity, CVSS 3.1, HTTP capture structure, hostname scope and selected secret patterns.

  • Uses SHA-256 integrity references
  • Runs locally with the Python standard library
  • Makes no network requests during its documented checks
What this does not establish

A READY result means only that configured checks passed. It is not proof of a vulnerability, evidence authenticity, authorization, complete redaction or analyst approval.

03 / Practitioner handbookPublic handbook and reader

Network Security Assessment Handbook

A 138-page practitioner handbook arranged in 19 parts, spanning assessment lifecycle, network, wireless, web, API, cloud, directory services and engagement management.

  • References NIST SP 800-115, PTES, OWASP and MITRE ATT&CK
  • Includes worked scenarios, protocols, attacks, tools and resources
  • Available as a repository artifact and searchable browser reader
What this does not establish

It is an educational practitioner reference, not a substitute for an engagement-specific method, licensed standard, audit opinion or certification.

04 / 19-topic learning collectionPublic repository

Ethical Hacking Labs

Nineteen topic guides developed from a university course, with credited student examples and defensive or detection perspectives alongside practical exercises.

  • Topics run from reconnaissance and enumeration through web, API, wireless, mobile, IoT/OT, cloud and cryptography
  • Guides distinguish authorized laboratory work from activity against real targets
  • Contributed student examples retain visible attribution
What this does not establish

Exercises belong in isolated, explicitly authorized environments. The collection does not confer a qualification or establish suitability for activity outside its stated lab boundaries.

Repository terms apply
05 / Six editable trackersPublic repository

GRC Working Templates

Six original spreadsheet trackers for risk, evidence, remediation, vendor review, policy registers and assessment scope.

  • Distributed as editable XLSX working files
  • Each tracker includes prepared rows, filters and controlled-choice fields
  • No macros, account sign-up or customer records are included
What this does not establish

These are working starters, not complete framework checklists, legal advice, audit workpapers or certification tools. They must be adapted and reviewed for the actual scope.

06 / Public weakness proposalReceipt acknowledged / evaluation pending

Session Termination CWE Proposal

A public proposal titled “Improper Enforcement of Explicit Session Termination,” submitted to the CWE content-development process.

  • Public issue opened 21 September 2026
  • Repository workflow state: Phase02-Ack-Receipt
  • The proposal and its discussion remain inspectable in the public issue
What this does not establish

This is a submitted and acknowledged proposal under evaluation. It is not an accepted CWE entry, an assigned CWE identifier or a published standard.

CWE repository contribution terms apply

PUT THE METHOD TO WORK

From artifact to decision.

Test a fictional board decision, assemble a bounded evidence claim or design a workshop around the same evidence-first method.

FIND YOUR NEXT PAGE

What are you looking for?

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to openEsc to close
CHECK BEFORE CONTINUING

Confirm action